Arbitrators “Exceeding Their Powers” Create Grounds to Vacate Awards
Resources for Construction Lawyers and ADR Professionals
Although arbitration is widely used to resolve disputes globally, not all arbitrations look the same. Arbitration proceedings vary widely depending on the parties’, counsels’, and arbitrators’ legal traditions.[1] At the American College of Construction Lawyers’ annual meeting, four seasoned international arbitrators[2] discussed…
Arbitration is a creature of contract[i]. So, it seems obvious that when considering a motion to compel arbitration, lawyers and judges should read the arbitration agreement carefully. However, in a recent Florida case apparently neither the trial court nor the appellate court…
“’Deepfakes’ are videos or images where a person’s face, body or voice has been digitally altered so they appear to be someone else, typically used maliciously or to spread false information.”[i] The rapid development of generative AI tools in the past few…
There are several reasons. Most commonly, arbitrators may have health problems making them unable to serve, they may pass away or they may have a conflict with a party or witness, requiring recusal.
Getting an attorney’s fee award in arbitration is the icing on the cake for many construction attorneys.
It’s well established that arbitrators should not have ex parte communications with parties to the proceedings. Such communications raise issues about the arbitrator’s impartiality and neutrality. Arbitrators should avoid oral or written ex parte communications with parties or counsel to prevent motions…